Pokémon Go Developer Clarifies Cheating Rules Amid Exploit Confusion

A recent wave of concern has swept through the Pokémon Go community, sparked by a warning attributed to a senior player claiming to relay a message from the game’s development team. The alert centers on a widely used exploit that allows players to interact with in-game locations—specifically raid lobbies—from slightly beyond the standard interaction range, typically using a Daily or Premium Raid Pass instead of the required Remote Raid Pass. This method, colloquially known among players as "flying," "floating," or "tricking," is now under scrutiny, with claims it violates the game’s Terms of Service and could lead to account penalties, including permanent bans.

The controversy stems from a message circulating in player communities, allegedly originating from a trusted Community Ambassador who claims to have received direct insight from Niantic. According to the warning, the developers are aware of the exploit and classify its use as a breach of the game’s anti-cheat policies. While the exploit doesn’t rely on third-party apps or GPS spoofing, it does manipulate unintended game behavior, enabling access to raids just outside the normal 40-meter radius—often within 100 meters. Many players argue this is merely a minor workaround rather than malicious cheating, especially when compared to more severe violations like location spoofing or account farming.

Understanding the Terms of Service

To clarify the situation, IGN reached out to Niantic for comment. The response directed attention back to the official Pokémon Go Terms of Service, particularly Section 3.1 on cheating:

3.1 Cheating
Niantic prohibits cheating, and we constantly take steps to improve our anti-cheat measures. Cheating includes any action that attempts to or actually alters or interferes with the normal behavior or rules of a Service. Cheating includes, but is not limited to, any of the following behavior, on your own behalf or on behalf of others:
- Accessing Services in an unauthorized manner (including using modified or unofficial third-party software);
- Playing with multiple accounts for the same Service;
- Sharing accounts;
- Using any techniques to alter or falsify a device’s location (for example through GPS spoofing); and/or
- Selling or trading accounts.
Apps may not work on devices that Niantic detects or reasonably suspects to be cheating, and Niantic will not provide support to players who attempt to cheat. You agree that Niantic may employ any lawful mechanisms to detect and respond to cheating, fraud, and other behavior prohibited under these Terms, including checking your device for the existence of exploits or hacking and/or unauthorized software. Please see the Guidelines and our Privacy Policy for more information.

While the exploit in question doesn’t involve GPS spoofing or third-party tools, it could arguably fall under the broader definition of "altering or interfering with the normal behavior" of the game. However, the same TOS also explicitly bans multi-accounting—a practice common among dedicated players—yet remains largely unenforced. This inconsistency has led to skepticism about whether Niantic intends to actively penalize users for using the raid exploit.

Community Reaction and the Gray Area of Exploits

The player base is divided. Some view the exploit as a harmless convenience that enhances accessibility, especially for those with limited mobility or internet access. Others acknowledge it as a technical violation, even if minor, and support potential removal to maintain fairness. The ambiguity of the warning—its origin, tone, and enforcement implications—has only deepened the confusion.

Given Niantic’s history of prioritizing detectable, large-scale cheating over minor exploits, widespread enforcement of this particular issue seems unlikely in the near term. That said, the exploit remains unintended behavior, and its continued existence is not guaranteed. While immediate account penalties appear improbable, players should remain aware that any activity contradicting the TOS carries inherent risk.

Ultimately, without a formal statement from Niantic clarifying their stance, the debate will likely continue. For now, the exploit persists in a gray zone—neither endorsed nor actively punished, but under the watchful eye of a development team committed to preserving the integrity of the game experience.

[ttpp]